What is the answer of the () +() +() =30 from to 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15?

1.  What is the answer of the () +() +() =30 from to 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15?

👇

Please Before Mathe Give me one love React🙏🙏🙏👇👇👇🙏🙏🙏

MATH SOLUTION HERE👇👇

To solve the equation $()+()+()=30$ using the numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, we need to consider the possibility of repeating numbers, as each number can be used more than once.

Let's test different combinations to find a solution:

1. Using three identical numbers:
   • $𝑥+𝑥+𝑥=30$
   • $3𝑥=30$
   • $𝑥=10$

However, 10 is not in our list, so this approach doesn't work.

2. Using a mix of different numbers:

   • Let's try different combinations systematically:
     • $15+15+0=30$ (not valid since 0 is not in the list)
     • $15+13+2=30$ (2 is not in the list)
     • $15+11+4=30$ (4 is not in the list)
     • $15+9+6=30$ (6 is not in the list)
     • $15+7+8=30$ (8 is not in the list)
     • $15+5+10=30$ (10 is not in the list)
     • $15+3+12=30$ (12 is not in the list)
     • $15+1+14=30$ (14 is not in the list)
     • $13+13+4=30$ (4 is not in the list)
     • $13+11+6=30$ (6 is not in the list)
     • $13+9+8=30$ (8 is not in the list)
     • $13+7+10=30$ (10 is not in the list)
     • $13+5+12=30$ (12 is not in the list)
     • $13+3+14=30$ (14 is not in the list)
     • $13+1+16=30$ (16 is not in the list)

2. Another approach - considering double counting:

   • If we reinterpret the problem to allow concatenation of digits, a potential solution emerges:

     • If we allow the concatenation of digits to form new numbers:
     • $11,9,10$

     However, we need to stay within the given list constraints.

Solution with Concatenation (if allowed):

• $15+15+0=30$ (using concatenation or reinterpreting the solution).

Considering these constraints strictly, there seems to be no valid solution using only the list provided without reinterpretation or concatenation. If additional information or rules are implied, such as using digits concatenated or other arithmetic tricks, that would change the approach. However, under strict interpretation, a straightforward solution does not exist within the provided numbers list.